6-7-13
Author’s Note: I
recently read The Power and the Glory by Graham Greene. In this book,
the main character is the last remaining priest in Mexico after religion is
banned. Throughout the book, he struggles with the idea of whether to run away
or stay in Mexico. The priest is nicknamed the whiskey priest because of his
serious drinking problem. Although I did
not particularly enjoy the book, it made me truly find my values. This story is
about the psychology and how we think about right and wrong. It actually is
mainly about the lack of right and wrong in the world. I hope this piece truly
makes you think about your life.
The Power to Find the Glory
The title saint puts somebody on a pedestal above the rest
of the world. A saint is somebody whom lived their whole life in the light of
Christ and was a perfect follower of His word. If this is true, then why does
every saint talk about how much better the other saints were? Why does every
saint consider himself not worthy of the respect that comes with the prefix
saint? Why do we expect so much more from ourselves than the people who love
and care for us? Our lives are not perfect, no matter how someone around us
sees us. The only person that knows all of our mistakes is us. This can be a
burden to live with. The truth is if we expect perfection, we will crumble
under the pressure, but if we stride for perfection, we will find greatness
along the way.
We all make mistakes. This is not only the most difficult
but the most completing realization in the world. This concept was nearly
impossible for the whiskey priest to grasp throughout the entire book. He
believed that he had to be perfect, and that the priests that had come before
them had been perfect. The truth is we must grasp two main concepts to truly understand
how to find glory in our life. The first: we must understand that the world is
not black and white. Everything is done in the gray area. Second: we must
understand that we can only control our actions. Not the result of these
actions, or how they are later perceived. These concepts are as complicated in
life as they are simple on paper.
Right and wrong. Good and bad. Smart and stupid. We all look
for approval in the world from the people we care about most. The whiskey
priest was no different. He found no purpose in his life, because he did not receive
the gratitude or the success that he wanted through his work. This is why the priest and we as people set
everything in the world in simple terms and leave no room for discussion or
deliberation. The world isn’t as simple or as negative as this. Think about one
of the simplest opposites: night and day. Life is just like night and day. Even
in times we believe that there is a no hope left, and the world has just gone
dark, there is still a little sliver of silver left in the world. The whiskey
priest out that even when he couldn’t tell that he couldn’t completely see the
good he had done in the world, there was still people who wanted to learn about
the Lord. The priest also learned that even when the sun is shining bright,
there is always a cloud somewhere, and sometimes those clouds are much bigger
than us. Immediately after the priest decided to stay in the country, and
preach the word of God to others. He believed that he was doing the right
thing, and that he was living by his convictions. He was. He did make the right
decision, but the Mexican government tried to tear down the priest. The government
of Mexico was the clouds blocking the light that we all desperately wanted.
We can’t control whether everybody else sees the light that
we see. We can only control what we see in every situation. Every decision has
a motive, an outcome and a consequence, no matter how minute or grand. We have
to understand why we do everything and be able to stand behind this when people
scrutinize our actions. Sometimes when we have good intentions, the outcome
does not display your true motive. The modern world makes it impossible to be
perfect, because the majority of people don’t care for motives and beliefs, but
instead make judgments derived from outcomes and results. We can’t just make
decisions on hunches or instincts because of this. We have to understand the
why of everything so that we can’t defend our stance to a world of critics. The
whiskey priest struggled with this because he couldn’t defend his own decisions
because he didn’t always believe he was doing the right thing. He never came to
understand that we could never make enough right decisions to silence these
critics. We have to understand that we can
never make enough right decisions to have the world glorify us because there
will always be that person who finds your one flaw. We have to understand that
our motives may not please the world, but if we can understand our decisions and make the decision that we want, we will be able to live with
ourselves.
When we live our lives with our personal decisions, it is
easy to defend ourselves because we understand the motive. When we try to
please people by doing the right thing, we can find it hard to stop the
onslaught of criticism. You only live once. A saying used as an excuse used by
teens all over the world, but it also has some true meaning. Why would we let somebody
live twice by letting them control our life? We must find a way to disregard
others wants and live by our own ambitions because we only get one chance in
this world. We must find a way to be proud of ourselves because people will
always try to bring keep us from realizing all the good we have done. We must
find a way to bring out the power within us to forget what the world’s critics
are saying about us, and realize what a glory our lives really are.
2/28/13
Living Life
When given a lifetime to do something, what are you going to
do? When your final years become your final months and eventually becoming your
final days, you will sit and reflect on your actions. Nobody, not even you,
will remember your thoughts of an entire life. Actions can create memories
though. These memories are your legacy. When your body dies, does your soul go
with it, or do you leave a footprint that is remembered forever.
Nothingness is the easy path in life. To live free willed,
doing what pleases yourself and having no conviction is easy, but people who do
nothing in life are easy forgotten. Padre Jose’s thought process about decisions
extends no further than his self
pleasure’s and finding the path of least resistance. Living a life nothing
leaves no legacy at all. With no legacy to define your life by, you are neither
worthy of heaven or hell. You are given an eternity of nothing for living a
life of nothing.
Legacy, anything that is handed
down from the past. If you are only remembered only in your short lifetime, you
have wasted your time. When asked what important decisions you’ve made in your
life, answers should come flowing off the tongue. Nothingness is the
unforgivable sin. Living a life just going with the flow is easy. It allow us
to just fit in with everybody around us and not make important decisions that
change lives. Without these decisions,
we leave no legacy, but if we work to make these decisions important enough we
can leave a footprint that last forever.
Not Just a Name
Author’s Note: For
this piece I was trying to continue on my goal of not ending sentences in
prepositional phrases, as well as finishing my piece with a thought provoking
conclusion.
John. Adam. Paul. Mathew. These are all simple, common
names, but they are also somebody’s identity. A name carries weight, it carries
somebody’s heart and soul, it carries somebody’s legacy. We give everybody
names, even if we don’t know them, like New Girl, Blondie, or California Kid.
There is something special about having a unique name though. This is why when
somebody is being serious you are called by your real name, because this
strikes home. Your name hits you somewhere deep below your shell. Can you
imagine that ever being taken away? Can you imagine if something that full of
life, just being pulled out from under you. Without a name, somebody can truly
become a nobody.
In Ironic Literature, the main character is often nameless.
In The Power and the Glory, the main character is referred as various
things depending on how the author wants the reader to view him. Some of the
common names are: the priest, the stranger and the man in the drill suit. These
names are things that describe the character, but they carry no true power.
When you hear “the priest,” your mind doesn’t race back to childhood memories
or long laughs or that inside joke that you’ve kept for years. Graham Greene is
showing the underlining purpose of a name, and the emotions a name can provoke.
Greene is showing that a name is something that we often take for granted. Many
do not see it as symbolism that defines us and our time in this world.
A name is as simple as a word. One word that can carry the
life of a person. One word that can engage anybody in a deep conversation. One
word that can leave the world a little
bit different. A name leaves a lingering legacy many years after someone takes
their last breath.
Why the Responsibilities
Author’s
Note: While having a conversation in our literature group, this section I refer
to came up. One of the group members asked how such a negative feeling,
responsibility, could not be distinguished from love. I completely disagreed
with the statement, and that is the motivation for this piece. While writing
this, I tried to work on how I end my sentences, not using prepositional
phrases.
“He was aware of an immense load of responsibility:
it was indistinguishable from love.” (Greene, The Power and the Glory 66).
Love, an intense feeling of deep affection. There is an immense amount of
responsibility that comes with a feeling like that. Responsibility, the feeling
or fact that you have to do deal with something. Responsibility leaves everybody
vulnerable to guilt. Guilt, the state of knowing that you have committed wrong
doing. Responsibility comes with any conviction, including love. Guilt does not
have to come with every responsibility though.
Responsibility is thought of as a negative feeling.
When your parents or your teachers ask you to be responsible, most people make
some excuse why they don’t have to this or that. People don’t like
responsibility because can show somebody’s weaknesses. Responsibility to God
was challenged, when the fire was set ablaze and he was dropped in, he was
melted down to his selfish core, where only his personal needs mattered. Without
responsibility, he conformed. can show that Superman is still Clark Kent. Without
responsibility though, we cannot have a true conviction. If we don’t feel the
need to do anything in life, than we are not truly convicted to anything. Padre
Jose was never truly convicted to his priesthood, and so he lacked the feeling
of responsibility. When his so called conviction
When given a whole life, what are you going to do
with it. This is the question that we all have to answer with our answers.
Anybody can talk about what they are going to do in life, but who is going to
leave a legacy with their actions. This is why we need responsibility, because
responsibility is that thing that when the world has turned against you, keeps
you pushing towards your goal. Life is not an easy trip from point A to point
B, so when life asks you to skip from A to C to get back to B, what is it that
will keep you moving. What will keep you from conforming, from becoming another
person on an assembly line.
1-29-13
Morals: The Drive of Your Life
Author’s Note: As I
was reading The Power and The Glory, I came to a section where everybody’s
morals were tested in a village. The villagers were given the choice to either
give up the whiskey priest, who was in
town, or the officer would take a hostage from the town. The honorable decision
could differ from person to person. It seems honorable to protect the last of God’s
servants, but they were also betraying their country by lying. This is where
morals come in. At this point everybody had to decide what is right, and what
is wrong.
For every person there is a line between right and wrong.
For some this line is very definite, dark and clear. For others this line is
more like a murky creek, waded in and out, but everybody has this imaginary
line. This line defines our morals. Our morals are beyond what our teachers or
parents tell us is right and wrong. Our morals are behind our every decision, and the purity of our morals are tested through
crises as a crucible tests the purity of metal through fire.
In The Power and The Glory, the village Concepcion morals
are tested. Where is their line? They must decide whether to save an old whiskey
priest, who is disliked by the village, and give up one of their own for death,
or defend their country and receive a 700 peso reward. At this point the
fire has been lit, but the people in the village cannot quite feel the heat.
They stand decide to protect the last of the prophets and give one of their own
in return. As the time goes by though, the fire burns brighter and hotter.
Every person finds themselves with an internal struggle, until they are finally
down to their core, and there is nothing left to mask their morals. In the heat
of the crucible, we can find what everybody’s made of.
At, I found quickly that there was a lack there
of crisis in my life. I can only speak of what I stand for because I have never
been challenged, never put in the fire. Someday I will be, we all will be
challenged. This is when you prove what you believe in. This is when you prove
what your morals are.
1-24-13
Author’s Note: This
piece is a continuation of my last post concerning Existentialism. This piece
refers a little more to the period of time this book was written in, and not
necessarily the book itself.
An institution is an idea or place that has just simply been
the way things are. Religion, school, and even marriage are modern day
institutions. The Existential period was the questioning of institutions, the
time when people started to decide for themselves whether or not the past had
to be the present. This began a chain of events that included an explosion in
the number of communist countries, and outlawing of religion. These events
created conflict, and soon became a problem, not a solution.
Although amplified by World War I, existentialism was invented
in the late 19th century. At this time many philosophers reasoned
that schools had less meaning than real life experience. Philosophers
contemplated whether or not school was even necessary because of the experience
many receive interacting with other humans. At the time, these were unpopular
thoughts throughout the world, and the ideas were pushed aside by most, but
when the world uncoiled in July of 1914 the people felt that something had to
change.
World War I left many wives without a husband, many fathers
without a son, and many houses empty and burned. What was left was a world that
felt betrayed by the ways if the past. Now the existentialist had seemed to
have a very valid argument. Maybe it was the lack of real world knowledge
because of kids having reading and writing crammed down there throat that
caused the war. Maybe it was people choice to believe in different things that
left millions dead. People even questioned
whether or not there was a reason to stay alive. These are the questions that created
what we now refer to as the post modern era.
The post modern era did not technically start until the end
of World War II, but many of the events associated with the era occurred well
before the start of the war. The boom in communism, the constant struggle
between freedom for the civilians and conformity for the government, these all
began as people sought a solution to make World War I the war to end all wars.
The people running the government truly believed they were unifying the world
and eliminating cultural diversity, ending any need for disputes. What
the leaders didn’t know is that they poured gasoline, and eventually there was
going to be a spark.
World War II left the world with more deaths than any other
war. Adolf Hitler believed that he was ridding the weak and he would stop at
nothing to create in his mind what was a perfect world. Hitler thought he was
doing his country a service, but he created the largest international dispute
to this day. Hindsight is always 20/20, and as we see now, the solutions that the world
offered after World War I, later became a problem in itself.
1-22-13
How Do We Make It
Author’s Note: I am currently reading The Power and the Glory by Graham Greene. This book was written in 1940, after World War I, in the Existential period. During this time, institutions such as religion were being questioned. In this book, Graham Greene places characters the book to reveal different way people dealt with the pain of life. The main character is going through the process of finding his conviction, what he believes in, to make decisions in his life.
Why is life worth living? How do we live with the pain of life? When is enough, enough? These were the questions that swirled through everybody’s head as the Existential period came about after World War 1. These questions are pulled away, layer by layer, as Graham Greene reveals the different answers to this question character by character.
Conviction. A word that has a simple definition, but is a complex answer. To have a conviction is to have a strong opinion or belief, but what is our conviction? What drives our every decision, our every thought? Living a life with no conviction is not living life at all. When people are given a lifetime to make something of it, and do nothing at all, they have wasted their life. A conviction can be the answer to any questions, because it is the reason you live. It is why you need to make it to tomorrow.
The lieutenant found his drive in pure hatred. He believed in his heart that anybody who believed in a god was committing treason. They were backstabbing his country, and he was not going to allow for this to happen. He made it his personal mission to find and end the life of the last priest, the whisky priest. In the early-mid 20th century, people felt no trust in religion as it was outlawed in most countries. People had felt that their God had betrayed them, leaving the millions of casualties of the Two World Wars. The lieutenant had a similar belief to many, he was an extremist though, he believed that anybody who believed in god, deserved to die.
Your family is always there for you to lean on. Even when the world seems to be attacking you from all sides, your family has your back. The mother in the story found strength in her family. Even as she was ready to quit, on life, her husband would not let her. This is a conviction that will never fade, a conviction that will never leave you. Love will always keep your family close, and keep you with a reason to make it to tomorrow.
Tomorrow will always be there. The sun will come up and light the way. There will be birds singing and cars bustling through the street. The question is will you be there tomorrow. Do you have a reason to ever wake up again?
I like how you tied in a little poetry at the end, and how you went over several topics. People don't always find their drive, which means they didn't live life the way it was meant to be.
ReplyDeleteThis is a good piece, and well above grade level. There are areas to improve, and we went over those, so I am confident you will make those changes for next time. I like how you take a confident stand about issues like the Lieutenant. I happen to disagree with your assessment at the same time. He does have conviction. Isn't he convinced that the new government is the right path to take? Isn't he convinced that the Church is an evil influence on people? He routes out the priests with vigor and true conviction to rid his country of religion.
ReplyDeleteResponse to Existentialism: I really appreciated how you used literary components to enhance your views on communism. The use of gasoline and a spark to describe how such extreme views have the tendency to explode provided a clear picture of the damage immoral convictions have. In the book, how do you think the conviction of the lieutenant will play out in the novel?
ReplyDeleteOn Existentialism: This is really an impressive piece for a few reasons. There are facts and background information here that are enlightening, and the way you wield your knowledge shows your depth of understanding. I would only caution you to be sure to somehow tie the book in at some point so that even if you simply want to discuss the side issue of existentialism, there is always the context of the novel which makes it germane. Think about a title being used more effectively.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Existentialism, I like how you made real life connections, like the last sentence in the fourth paragraph. I also like how you talked about the book, but used extra research from elsewhere to connect it to the book. This one is particularly better than the first, because you talked about a narrower topic, and get the reader more engaged in your writing.
ReplyDeleteIn response to Morals, I think that it is well written, I like what you are getting at, but just make sure to check your conventions a little more closely. A little revision could help this piece.
ReplyDeleteOn Why The Responsibilities: Once again, your conventions are not quite there, but I like the point you are trying to get across, except you go to a weird place in the third paragraph. You should also try and make your body and conclusion paragraph more understandable for the reader.
ReplyDelete